![]() | ![]() |
|
|
INTRODUCTION
In my previous essay I have mentioned and discussed how a complex network of intersecting corruption of the English political, legal, financial, and cultural establishment all contributed to the development of the South Sea Bubble.
In this essay I am going to explain which mechanism were used to keep the share price of the S 343d39d outh Sea Company artificially high and who profited and who lost from the bubble and how.
Finally, I will compare and contrast this answer with the issuance of internet stocks in the 1990s.
THE SOUTH SEA BUBBLE
The South Sea Company, offered to buy out a large portion of the English National Debt in 1719 which had reached an astonishing total of £130 by the end of the war. Making it resemble more of a financial management organization than a commercial enterprise
In January 1720, South Sea Company stock was trading at a modest
price. In an effort to rouse up popular interest in the company's stock, the
directors disseminated false declarations of success and imaginary tales of
The share price rose to around £200 in February. Interest in the company was furthered along in March when the government authorized a proposal from the company to assume yet more of the national debt in exchange for shares of South Sea Company stock.
The South Sea Company's proposal was chosen over that of its principal competitor, the Bank of England because has the support of the king and from some parliamentary. With investor confidence increasing, the share price climbed to approximately £350 by the end of March.
"Holders of long-term irredeemable bonds like annuities would be
persuaded to trade them for company stock. The only reason why a holder should
want to make the trade of annuities against stock was a belief that a swift appreciation
of
As the South Sea Bubble was developing, a general interest in joint-stock investment opportunities was also picking up rapidly. By the middle of 1720, the market was flooded with a remarkable range of new ventures, each creating smaller bubbles as the speculative frenzy mounted. As reported by the usagold.com the: "South Sea Company stock benefited from the investor mania. So great was the confusion of the crowd in the alley, that shares in the same bubble were known to have been sold at the same instant ten per cent higher at one end of the alley than at the other."
Investor confidence began to disappear, however. The sell-off began by early July and the collapse occurred rapidly.
In September 1720, banks failed when they could not collect loans on inflated stock, prices of stock fell further, and thousands were ruined.
In 1721 took place a formal investigations which: "discovered that 462 members of the Commons and 112 aristocrats were involved" , and showed a network of dishonesty, corruption, and fraud that led to the prosecution of many of the major players in the crisis, including both company and government officials.
The company was wound up, with a complete re-organization of the Company, the Directors removed and penalized with loss of the bulk of their estates judged to be ill-gotten, part of the Company's stock was engrafted onto the capital of the Bank of England, and the remaining stock divided into half.
It was clear to investors at the time, however, as it would be for
investors in the
One reason was that they enabled speculators in the stock to leverage their investments, gaining the rise in the price of the full share on a partially paid up subscription for a new share.
Second reason certainly understood by the infamous stockjobbers crowding the coffee houses of Exchange Alley, was the option value of defaulting on future instalments in case the stock began to lose value in the market. Share warrants, as they were later named formally, always priced higher than the regular shares.
Finally, if the option value varied among the three subscriptions, and they certainly did as the value of defaulting on future instalments rose sharply with the Third Subscription, we should expect differences in the prices of the subscription shares to emerge, and more so as the regular stock began its precipitous decline in August 1720.
"Fortunes had been lost. But others had been won. The crisis was more psychological than fiscal."
THE INTERNET BUBBLE
The South Sea Bubble affair takes on new allegorical overtones with each generation of financial exploration. In the early years of the twenty-first century, it is the events of the dotcom bubble scandal that call to mind the lessons of the past.
The Internet market of 2000 is surprisingly close - despite the immense difference in technology, culture, most of the incidents of daily life - to the events of the 1720's.
Around 1994, the internet, was first being made available to the general public. By the late 1990's the dotcom had evolved as a way to communicate using email, use chat rooms and view informational websites.
Almost immediately, businesses saw the internet as a profit opportunity. As the internet moved from the hobbyist domain to a commercialized marketplace, online business owners became fantastically wealthy. Many technology companies were now selling stock in IPO's.
During the Internet bubble, Web-based brokerages started making promises - which were largely false - to democratize this market by giving small traders access to IPO stock. These brokerages themselves failed to get access to as many shares as they expected. They claimed to assign you shares on a casual lottery method.
These brokerages were unable or unwilling to deliver on their promises and created significant dissatisfaction among customers who were again reminded that they formed part of the sucker class.
During the Internet bubble, bankers found several ways of evading responsibility:
First, there was a general weakening of standards, a sense that none of the usual rules applied. Instead of five years of operations and one of profitability, companies were going out after just months of operations, with substantial losses and no clear plan for profitability but big promises of future exponential sales only on business plans.
Secondly, the bankers frequently sold their own companies during this period. Companies which had been proudly independent for more than a century suddenly merged with large banks and brokerages, creating a break in the moral continuum
Moreover, when the price of every Internet stock gave way, the bankers were able to present it, with significant support in the media, as a mysterious storm that broke over everyone's heads, which could not have been predicted or avoided by anyone. I believe this is a lie and I suspect most bankers knew pretty well when the market would collapse.
When the Internet bubble bursts, lot of ordinary people suffered.
When the
Compared to all-time lows before the bubble's
These days, investors in
From the latest news, emerged that the offices of Livedoor Co.
(which operates one of
Reports from
Now officials are wading through thousands of emails to try and figure out if there is any truth in the allegations. But it gets worse. News about Livedoor set off a flurry of panic selling. In turn, this overloaded the computer systems at the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) forcing it to suspend trading early for the first time in more than fifty years.
CONCLUSION
History repeats itself and human beings do not seem to learn from
their previous experiences. We have seen bubbles like the South Sea Company in
the
Word count: 1602
BIBLIOGRAPY
Books:
Balen, M. (2003) A very English Deceit, Fourth Estate
Simon Schama (2003), A history of
Vaitilingam, (2001) Using the Financial Pages, Pentice Hall
Web:
www.stock-market.net
References:
1) From: A history of Britain 2, pages 287-288
2) From: www.usagold.com
3) From: www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history
Privacy |
Articolo informazione
Commentare questo articolo:Non sei registratoDevi essere registrato per commentare ISCRIVITI |
Copiare il codice nella pagina web del tuo sito. |
Copyright InfTub.com 2024